A Pebble mine exploratory drill rig/Erin McKittrick, Wikimedia Commons
Once thought to be on the verge of death, Alaska’s proposed Pebble prospect copper and gold mine seems to be taking on a new life.
First came the July announcement by the Environmental Protection Agency of President Donald Trump that it planned to lift a proposed ban on the mine ordered by the EPA of President Barrack Obama.
And now MustReadAlaska.com is reporting conservative Anchorage talk-show host Rick Rydell – a hunting, fishing and development advocate – could be in line to become EPA’s man in Alaska for the Trump. Reached by phone on Sunday, Rydell said, only “no comment.”
Rydell is not unqualified for the job. He once worked as an environmental manager for Bristol Environmental Services, a subsidiary of the Bristol Bay Native Corporation. The company cleaned up old, U.S. Air Force dumpsites near King Salmon on the east edge of the bay.
Friends of Rydell said he is well familiar with federal environment laws.
The Obama administration wanted to use those laws, the Clean Water Act in particular, to prohibit the discharge of any dredged or fill material into any water in the Pebble mining area near Iliamna Lake, about 200 miles west of Anchorage, an EPA press release said.
Such a ruling would have made a mine impossible given that you can’t mine without moving dirt and even if you store tailings on dry land water runs somewhere after every rain.
Business strikes back
The Pebble Limited Partnership sued the Obama administration and the EPA of Trump – taking a page from the playbook of enviromental organizations fond of filing lawsuits to leverage legal settlements – in this case negotiated an agreement allowing Pebble to apply for the necessary permits.
With the door cracked open, the mine this month proposed a scaled down version of the earlier mine with increased environmental safeguards – among them a ban on the use of cyanide to aid in leaching gold, strengthened facilities to protect against any imaginable earthquake, and a ferry across Iliamna Lake to avoid the need for a road connection between the community of Iliamna and Cook Inlet.
Nearly the size of Rhode Island, Iliamna is the largest lake in the 49th state and the third largest lake fully within U.S. boundaries. Primitive, 15.5 mile Williamsport Road already connects Cook Inlet to Pile Bay on the lake, but Iliamna residents have worried that if the road were upgraded and connected to the communities of Iliamna, population 110, and nearby Newhalen, population 160, they might face an invasion of tourists and residents of urban Alaska.
Perceived people problems – whether real or imagined – invariably complicate discussion of any sort of development in rural Alaska and especially around Iliamna Lake.
The streams that drain into the lake and feed to the sea via the Kvichak River support massive salmon runs. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game estimates that about 25 percent of the 56 million sockeye salmon that returned to the Bay this summer were bound for the Kvichak/Iliamna watershed.
Bristol Bay commercial fishermen, 81 percent of whom are non-residents, have almost unanimously opposed the mine because any sort of water pollution might reduce salmon runs. Exclusive fishing lodges in the area, which cater to global clients wanting a wilderness experience, have opposed the mine because the jobs associated with mine development are likely to spark population growth.
And Alaskans, in general, have opposed the mine because they’ve bought into the idea that it is impossible to mine without destroying the environment.
“Residents have overwhelmingly opposed the mine because they know it would destroy their livelihoods, culture, and way of life,” the environmental group Trustees for Alaska says in summing all these concerns.
Sweetening the deal
With Alaska in a recession and looking to have few ways out, Pebble’s answer is now a promise to share the wealth if the project goes forward. The company has promised to:
- Create some sort of local and regional revenue-sharing plan.
- Prioritize the development of low-cost energy in the Iliamna area, where some now struggle to pay their electric and heating bills.
- And work with commercial fishermen on ways to help stabilize their markets and get local fishermen back into the fishing business.
Given the politics of the situation, though, promises of a smaller, environmentally friendly mine with benefits doesn’t seem to have done much to change minds.
Even before Pebble rolled out the new plan at the Alaska Resource Development Council in Anchorage on Thursday, Gov. Bill Walker was voicing his opposition.
“I’m not supportive of the mine,” he told Elizaeth Harball, a reporter for KTOO public radio and TV in the state’s capital. “I do not have information sufficient for me to be comfortable or supportive of the Pebble Mine. The burden is on them to prove that it can be done without a risk to the fish in that area. It’s a high burden – it’s the highest burden, and to me, they have not met that yet.”
The reaction of Pebble Limited Partnership CEO Tom Collier, who played ball in the big leagues as chief of staff for Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt in the Clinton Administration, was to embrace Walker’s comments and volley back.
“Gov. Walker specifically said he did not have sufficient information for him to be comfortable or supportive of Pebble. He emphasized the burden was on us to prove the project can be done without a risk to the fish in that area. He went on to say it is a high burden that we have not yet met.
“And he is correct,” Collier said in a prepared statement.
“The next step is for Pebble to file a comprehensive plan with the state and federal regulatory agencies and for them to do their work. This agency review should be done without prejudging our work either in support or in opposition. As the head of Alaska’s executive branch in charge of these reviews, Gov. Walker’s position is well stated.”
And then Collier put the knife in:
“Alaska Public Radio portrayed this appropriate skepticism by the governor as doubling down on his opposition to Pebble, a misleading and incorrect portrayal of his position that remains uncorrected.”
“The Alaska mining community knows Gov. Walker supports mining. We also know he supports fishing. And above all we know he supports a fair process for projects that could contribute to growing Alaska’s economy, providing new jobs, and contributing to local and state government revenue.”
Recessionary forces
Collier, in releasing the public statement, did not put the last line in boldface type to emphasize it, but he might as well have done so.
Walker has called the Legislature back into special session for the fourth time this year. Lawmakers are to start meeting in Juneau on Oct. 23 to once again to discuss revenue in a state with a big, fat savings account, but a serious cashflow problem.
Walker now wants the Legislature to approve a 1.5 percent payroll taxes on wages that would be capped at $2,200 or twice the previous year’s permanent fund dividend (PFD), whichever is bigger. The PFD is an annual payment to Alaska residents based on a percentage of the earnings of the oil-revenue-fueled Permanent Fund.
Walker says that under his plan, low-paid Alaskans would get to keep most of their PFD. The break even point – where earnings would zero out the PFD – is around $65,000 per year.
With the dividend set at $1,100, the Walker administration calculates someone making $25,000 per year would net $725 after paying $375 in taxes; someone making $50,000 would net $350; and someone making $75,000 would lose their PFD and be required to pay the state another $25.
Above $75,000, the payments to the state progressively increase to the $200,000 per year level where the payroll tax is now capped at $1,100, the current dividend amount.
“The proposal is expected to generate between $300 million and $325 million—about 15 percent of which is projected to come from non-resident workers, who in 2015 earned more than $2.7 billion (in Alaska),” according to the Walker administration.
Trying to squeeze revenue out of non-resident workers and tourists in Alaska is hugely popular on the political front at a time when low oil prices have put a state with a budget built around oil taxes in a tough spot. Spending is now almost $3 billion higher than revenue
Walker’s plan doesn’t do much to change that. The non-partisan, citizen’s group Common Ground calculates that every man, woman and child in Alaska would need to pony up approximately $3,900 to balance the budget.
The state is now covering that deficit with savings. Without an increase in oil revenues – either because oil prices go up or more oil starts flowing through the transAlsaka oil pipeline – the state could soon reach a point where it has little choice but to tap into the now nearly $62 billion Permanent Fund.
Whether that – or the promise of a smaller, cleaner mine – will sway any mine opponents remains to be seen.