The answer is out there….
What if scientists created a medicine that lengthened lives, cut the risk of dying from heart disease by about a third, reduced the risk of developing cancer by more than a quarter, and showed -at least in the case of the new virus that drove the last pandemic – a nearly 400 percent better chance of surviving a previously unknown pathogen?
What if the medicine cost nothing to produce and thus could be made available for free to everyone?
What if the same medicine had been studied for decades and shown absolutely no negative, long-term health consequences?
What if the medicine was so safe that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration didn’t require it be labeled with warnings of thyroid, C-cell tumors, pancreatitis, diabetic retinopathy complications, acute kidney injury and acute gallbladder disease, which just happen to be among the warnings attached to Ozempic, one of the GLP-1 weight loss drugs now flooding American pharmacies as the nation wrestles with an epidemic of obesity?
What if the medicine was good for children and could be administered to them almost without their noticing?
Wouldn’t a U.S. government that launched a full-court press to get Americans to vaccinate themselves against Covid and went so far as to order members of the Department of Defense’s special forces, among the fittest people in the country, to get vaccinated against their wishes, be all over promoting a medicine like this?
Wouldn’t it be every day hammering away at the message that Americans need to take their medicine, and offering them tax-break incentives for doing so, given the economic costs of ill health in this country?
And yet, despite all of this, the administration of President Donald Trump, which promised to “Make America Healthy Again,” says almost nothing about this free-to-all medicine that already exists and could make Americans healthy again.
Then again, in fairness to Trump, the administration of former President Joe Biden didn’t do jack to promote this medicine, either, or the previous Trump administration. First Lady Michelle Obama did at least take a shot at messaging on a small scale when her husband was president, but her “Let’s Move” campaign was aimed at the country’s little people – ie. children – who are now too often found to be growing in width as fast as they grow in height.
And one of the significant reasons they are getting rounder is linked to their inactvity. They don’t exercise, and well….
Exercise is Medicine
The Euros are least trying to do something about the steady decreasing physical activity that has been going on since motor vehicles started dictating urban design. They have yet to register much success. But at least they have a goal – a 15 percent reduction in the proportion of inactive Europeans by 2030. Many European nations now have “active travel” programs aimed at getting people to exercise by walking or cycling to work.
A few are offering tax breaks for those who document exercise or reimbursing citizens for health club costs. The big problem in getting Westerners moving, however, seems to be a philosophical one. Few want to accept that their lack of physical activity is making them unhealthy and encouraging their earlier deaths.
The pandemic of the unhealthy didn’t even seem to get their attention, but then again the Anthony Faucis of the world, along with the American medical establishment, didn’t do a very good job of messsaging what was going on there. This would appear to be a univeral problem.
“Although (lack of physical activity (PA) is) a leading risk factor for non-communicable diseases (NCDs), its burden has been systematically underestimated in global health metrics,” wrote, noting that a lack of PA is linked to “more than 5 million deaths annually, with an all-cause mortality risk because of inactivity comparable to smoking or obesity.”
The researchers concluded a big part of the problem is a lack of leadership.
“At a national level, a cross-government resolution for physical activity as a policy priority is needed through universal political commitment,” they wrote. .”This could provide comprehensive, integrated and collaborative strategies to increase physical activity, such as those already applied to tobacco control.”
Good luck with that. In the U.S. The last American political leader with the courage to say what needs to be said was the late President John F. Kennedy, and that was 66 years ago. The President-elect in December 1960, Kennedy took to Sport Illustrated magazine – the media ‘influencer’ of the time – to chastise “The Soft American.”
Americans were already falling behind Europeans in fitness in the 1960 and Kennedy warned that the “harsh fact of the matter is that there is also an increasingly large number of young Americans who are neglecting their bodies – whose physical fitness is not what it should be – who are getting soft. And such softness on the part of individual citizens can help to strip and destroy the vitality of a nation.”
There was a brief improvement in the years that followed. The country witnessed a running ‘boom’ in the 1970s. The benefits would accrue in the future. In “A history of jogging and running – the boom of the 1970s,” Dr. S. Robert Latham would observe that when q group of researchers led by Duck-chul Lee at Iowa State University took a 15-year look back at the medical records of more than 55,000 people associated with the Cooper Clinic, the found that “runners had a 45 percent lower risk of cardiovascular mortality and a three year increase in life expectancy over nonrunners.”
But the running boom, despite the well-documented benefits, was destined to die in a society where making life ‘easy’ became priority number one. Americans were destined to become part of a “drive-thru” society where people did everything they could to avoid moving their asses under their own power.
And when Americans are sitting on their ever-wider asses eating fast food in their motor vehicles, they’re sitting in front of some sort of screen watching or reading something. According to tracking data from Ooma, a telecommunications company, the average American (age 16-65) spent more than seven hours viewing screens in 2024, up from about six and a half hours in 2019.
Most of that time is spent sitting, and plays a big part in the sedenary lifestyle credit with shortening the lives of more and more Americans.
You, in fact, probably shouldn’t be reading this now. Go take a walk or a run or pedal.
Categories: Commentary
