Chester Creek, an Anchorage park taken over by the homeless/Craig Medred photo
Is there hope for Anchorage?
Having become the Portland of the North, or worse, what will Anchorage do now that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled the homeless can be prevented from camping out wherever and whenever they choose?
Anchorage – the city that once promoted its “Big Wild Life” – has continued to allow the homeless to run wild with sprawling encampments full of stolen goods overflowing parts of the city’s greenbelts.
Sanitation has been ignored. Logging in the Chester and Campbell Creek watersheds has been overlooked. And litter has been allowed to proliferate.
Meanwhile, the city fathers and mothers have done little more than argue about what to do about the problem while doing little, and some of the most sympathetic on social media have taken on the role of enablers for bad behavior.
Because, well, some of the homeless just can’t help themselves, and there’s little doubt they can’t.
He was right about that. Some of the homeless have mental problems with which society doesn’t want to deal. Others suffer from addictions to drugs and alcohol. And some, believe it or not, prefer the lifestyle.
As one camper tucked away in a back corner of a chunk of municipally owned land between the Eastchester and Sitka Street parks explained, it’s nice to find a place to stay indoors for the winter, but for the warmer months, it’s much more enjoyable to camp free of household rules and the burden of trying to get along with roommates, family or friends.
He was, it must be added, among the cleanest and most discrete of Anchorage’s homeless campers, and the city’s problems with the vagrants who have overrun its public spaces would be a lot less if they were all like him.
They’re not.
And because of this, to steal a line from the late Alaska Gov. Wally Hickel, “you can’t just let nature run wild,” and most of the homeless are living in a primitive, “natural” style albeit with some of the comforts of the modern day – cell phones, propane heaters, stolen propane, beer coolers and more.
Some in Anchorage seem willing to accept their lifestyle as is, too, and the local chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) did its best to support the lifestyle. It is unlikely, however, that if the issue were put to Anchorage voters today the majority would favor letting the craziness continue as it has for years now.
And it was the opinion of the Supreme Court that a community’s majority should have the right to decide how to handle the situation.
Given the problem is complex, Gorsuch wrote, “so may be the public policy responses required to address it. A handful of federal judges cannot begin to ‘match’ the collective wisdom the American people possess in deciding ‘how best to handle’ a pressing social question like homelessness.”
It will be interesting to see what Anchorage’s new mayor and assembly do next to harness “the collective wisdom” of local voters.
It always seemed to me that the least the city could do is charge those who make a mess with littering and, if they proved unable to pay the fine, ask a judge to sentence them to community service, preferably on litter pickup details.
Given the energy some of Anchorage’s homeless have put into building camps, they clearly do not lack the physical ability to get this job done, and supervised work details might actually help some of them develop enough discipline in their lives to go get a job.
And, at the very least, court-ordered labor to clean up the mess created by the combination of the homeless, the ACLU and the city’s political elite could help restore the public spaces that were once Anchorage’s most attractive feature.
Categories: Commentary, News

“……..It always seemed to me that the least the city could do is charge those who make a mess with littering and, if they proved unable to pay the fine, ask a judge to sentence them to community service, preferably on litter pickup details……….”
That’s way too simple, Craig. Don’t you remember the brouhaha about that junk being their “possessions” and the city requirement to “notify” and “schedule” the cleanup for 10 days later to give the owners the ability to secure their stuff?
Everything the enablers have done has been to block every attempt to bring this situation (of their creation) back under control. This entire issue, coordinated to go nationwide, has been all about communist housing. Back to “the projects” we go. “Society’s responsibility” to house and feed the poor while they focus their energies on crime. Bubba pronounced, “The end of Welfare, as we know it”………and they went right to work creating the new model through bedlam and legal force.
This ruling will be ignored by the homeless industry. They have fresh power in this municipal government. We have a long, long way to go.
The Assembly and Administration used the 9th Circuit opinions to simply duck what the Court required; all we had to do is demonstrate available housing.
Now let the brutality commence
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-175_19m2.pdf