News

Killer road

Brayton Drive, one of Anchorage’s deadly roads/Craig Medred photo

 

A news analysis

The Anchorage Police Department is refusing to identify the hit-and-run driver who a week ago killed 33-year-old Aaron Cleveland on Brayton Road, a state-designated “bike route” that has become a hotspot for collisions between motor vehicles and vulnerable road users.

Despite the fact that it is a crime to leave the scene of a collision “resulting in injury to or death of a person” in the state of Alaska, APD spokesman Christopher Barraza Thursday said via email that the driver has not been charged “as the investigation is ongoing. That is all APD will comment on at this time.”

Pretty much nationwide, claims of “ongoing investigations” are a standard law enforcement tactic for keeping public information from the public. And in fairness to the unnamed driver involved in this homicide, it is possible the only crime committed was leaving the scene of an accident.

The original statement from APD said that “initial indications are that two pedestrians were walking south on or along Brayton Drive near Mockingbird Drive when one adult male was struck by a vehicle heading northbound on Brayton. The other pedestrian was uninjured.”

It is possible, for instance, that the other pedestrian pushed Cleveland in front of the motor vehicle or played some role in Cleveland’s death, but the statement also said “the vehicle fled the scene and remains outstanding. This is an ongoing investigation; more information will be released as it becomes available.”

The only information released after that was that the vehicle had been located 15 hours later and that the dead man was Cleveland. Everything else remains cloaked behind the claim of an ongoing investigation.

Precedent

APD used a similar claim of an investigation to avoid talking about the death of retired dentist Carlton Higgins in 2023.

In the wake of his death, commenters piled on to APD’s Facebook page to suggest that Higgins’ actions had caused his death, something APD did nothing to refute. Five months later, however, the Alaska Landmine revealed Higgins had been legally crossing the road in a crosswalk – where pedestrians have the right-of-way – when run over by a truck driven by the husband of a former Anchorage judge.

If not for the Landmine’s reporting, the perpetrator in the Higgins homicide would have gone unidentified, as is usually the case for drivers who kill vulnerable road users in Anchorage. The Landmine also revealed that a minor charge had been placed against Russell Webb for the death of Higgins.

Webb was cited for failure to yield to a pedestrian in a crosswalk and paid a $100 fine.

“When asked why the driver who killed Higgins did not face criminal charges, despite the finding that the driver had broken the law and was fully responsible for the collision, APD told the Landmine that no ‘other factors’ supported criminal charges,” the Landmine’s Paxson Woelber wrote.

“APD stated that the driver was not impaired, was licensed and insured, and was following all rules of the road other than those he broke when he killed Higgins.”

Health Science Reports in 2023 fingered “a lack of efficient and systematic enforcement” as one of the factors leading to an increase in deadly motor vehicle collisions in the U.S.

A 2024 study published in Transport Findingslater  beneath the title “Windshield Bias, Car Brain, Motornormativity: Different Names, Same Obscured Public Health Hazard.” It reported finding “robust evidence” that U.S. roads are becoming incresaingly unsafe, especially for vulnerable road users, because “people excuse the negative effects of car use in ways that obscure the public health hazard.”

At a governmental level, Brayton Drive could be the poster child for the willingness to “excuse the negative effects of car use.”

Human targets

An access road along the Seward Highway in South Anchorage, Brayton is a two-lane, one-way road with a narrow shoulder, no sidewalk and no bike lane despite being posted as a designated Anchorage “bike route.”

After 13-year-old Zakkary Mann was struck by a hit-and-run driver and seriously injured while riding his bike home along the road in 2022, the Alaska Department of Transportation, which is in charge of managing the roadway, declared the “bike route” signage meaningless.

Nothing has changed since.

As for the driver who hit Mann, that individual was never found because APD put no effort into looking for him or her. Mann’s mother, Shana, eventually turned to the media for assistance, but a story done by KTUU-TV asking for help in identifying the driver mainly resulted in Shana coming under fire for letting her son ride the road home from South Anchorage’s Get Air Trampoline Park less than a mile south because there really is no other route between the two points. 

The Anchorage municipal bike plan in 2006 recommended that a separated path be created along Brayton to provide safety for cyclists and other vulnerable road users.  Instead, an unaltered Brayton was incorporated into the U.S. Bicycle Route system. Thus the “Bike Route” sign indicating some degree of safety on a roadway where people are struck by motor vehicles with some regularity.

Zachary was lucky to survive being run down on the road. Others have not been so lucky.

Cleveland became the third vulnerable road user to be killed along the road in the past 19 years.

After 27-year-old Tia Smart was struck and killed while walking along the drive in 2016, the car-brain Associated Press suggested she was asking for it, reporting that although the “drive has no sidewalk…pedestrians are not prohibited.”

As if frontage roads somewhere in America prohibit pedestrians from walking alongside.

The driver who killed Smart was never publicly identified by APD, and it is unknown whether he or she was cited for anything.

After 38-year-old Kasey Turner was run down and killed along the road in 2018, an APD spokeswoman defended the unnamed driver who killed him by claiming “visibility and road conditions” were to blame for Turner’s death, and then pointed the finger at the deadman.

“Turner was partially in the roadway and not on a sidewalk, and he was wearing dark clothing,” she told the Anchorage Daily News. “Pedestrians should always utilize sidewalks or keep as far away from the main road as possible.”

There is no sidewalk along Brayton, and the statement that Turner was only “partially in the roadway” would indicate he was also partially out of it, trying – in other words – to keep away from “the main road as possible.”

As in the case of Smart, the driver who killed Turner was never identified, and it is unknown if he or she was ever cited for anything although Anchorage does have a basic speed law stipulating that “no person may drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazard then existing.”

The ADN did not think to ask the APD spokeswoman whether the agency should be advising drivers to slow down and use more care when confronted with “visibility and road conditions,” such as darkness and ice, that limit a driver’s ability to control and stop a vehicle to avoid running into people or things.

APD can’t really be blamed for its behaviour here, either.  It is simply reflecting what has become a societal norm in a country where bad driving is accepted as a necessary consequence of cities designed in such a way that people ‘need” motor vehicles to survive.

Though less than 65 percent of Americans drove to work in 1960, according to the U.S. Department of Energy, almost everyone drives to work now.  Largely gone are the 10 percent who walked and the nearly 20 percent who rode a bike or took public transit, which usually required them to walk some distance to work before they got off the bus or train.

Today close to 90 percent drive and the number of walkers has dropped to 3 percent, even though the lack of daily physical activity in this country is leading to hundreds of thousands of early deaths.

Health consequences

“Despite breakthrough advances in the management of acute myocardial infarctions and strokes, an 80 percent increase in the use of statin therapy in the last two decades, and a reduction in the national average levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, cardiovascular deaths are now rising among working-age Americans,” researchers from the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine reported in the peer-reviewed American Journal of Preventive Cardiology in 2020. “These concerning trends may be explained by striking increases in the incidence and prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes across the country. As of 2019, 69 percent of US adults were overweight or obese, and more than 30 million had diabetes.”

The study pointed out the well-established links between these epidemic health issues and a lack of physical activity plus poor diets. It also noted the failure of past efforts “aimed at curbing these epidemics by increasing the levels of physical activity and improving the dietary choices of Americans,” after which it added this:

“This failure may have been in part due to the fact that while lifestyle recommendations, particularly those regarding physical activity, are typically understood as targeting leisure time, the average adult working-class American men and women spend at least 50 percent of their workday awake time at their jobs. Moreover, more than 80 percent of jobs in the U.S. involve mostly sedentary activities, which results in daily exposure to long sitting hours and a colossal work-related lifetime exposure to physically inactive behaviors.

“Since 1950, the contraction of the manufacturing industry, the expansion of automation, and the rise of service and technology industries have resulted in an 83 percent increase in physically inactive jobs. Physically demanding occupations now make up less than 20 percent of the US workforce, down from nearly 50 percent of jobs in 1960. Thus, over the last 60 years, the American workforce collectively ‘sat down’; while in the 1960s, many workers would meet (healthy) recommendations for daily physical activity just with the activities performed during workhours, as of 2020 the majority spend most of their 8.5 ​hours per workday at work sitting.”

But not only are people sitting down more at work, they are spending more time sitting down in their motor vehicles as commuting times to work increase, and even more time sitting down behind screens – be they computer or TV screens – when not at work.

The researchers recommended the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) should get involved  in “workplace health promotion interventions” to  “to preserve our human resources.” Such federal intervention seems unlikely under the Trump administration despite Health and Human Services Secretary John F. Kennedy Jr.’s campaign to Make America Healthy Again (MAHA).

But there are things individual American communities can do, and the least of those things – in a country where necessary, physical activity is badly lacking – is to make it safe for people to get out of their motor vehicles and get around under their own power.

But instead, many communities, Anchorage among them, have ignored the problem. As a result, Alaska’s largest city managed to set a record for pedestrian deaths last year, and though APD is to not to blame for that, the agency does bear some responsibility for protecting bad drivers and treating the deaths of vulnerable road users as acceptable collateral damage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 replies »

  1. And

    From dot engineer in response to moa traffic engineer:

    From: Thomas, Scott E (DOT)
    Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2022 5:15 PM
    To: Coy, Bradly B
    Subject: RE: Purpose of specific signage

    [EXTERNAL EMAIL]

    There is a facility, maybe just not dedicated for exclusive use or what is desired in the latest planning.

    The frontage route is legal and better than being on the freeway with high speed exits and entries. A shared use frontage road is a legal bike facility, and with a shoulder is still a legal bike facility. Peds can also share lanes if there is no shoulder, and shoulders if there is no path. It does not have to be a bike lane.

    Bike Lane regulatory signs are a different sign for exclusive facilities. I would not sign that way without peds also having a facility. This may just be an older area of town still pending upgrades in future projects. Much of Brayton is getting improved facilities as we rebuild the Seward Hwy to O’Malley.

    FHWA’s latest Guide for the Selection of Bicycle Facilities has a great chart bringing together all the latest ITE and NACTO levels of desired facilities and when they are more appropriate. (Fig 9, 10)

    If someone desires more than is legal above – they need to a) work with their community for broad public concurrence, and b) follow the AMATS Nonmotorized Plan for prioritization and funding, which c) was developed with broad public concurrence, and d) is updatable if something was missed, with broad public concurrence or review process.

    Scott

  2. Here is DOT’s response and my initial query from back three years ago

    Hello, Marc:

    BIKE ROUTE signs are placed by the City when desired – on all roads ( between capital projects), and by the State DOTPF (when we have capital projects). It is a community designation as determined through the joint City/State AMATS Nomotorized Plan 2021. DOTPF puts up these signs to redirect cyclists from freeways to alternate routes when available. This is what occurs from the Seward Highway to Brayton Drive.

    BIKE ROUTES are routes, not facility types. BIKE ROUTES can point to any type of facility legal for bicycle use. The Rules of the Road are commonly the same as for motorists, but when directed to shared use pathways, the cyclist can choose either to be a vehicle on the road, shared use if need be, or can choose to be on the path, under pedestrian laws.

    While some cyclists desire a dedicated protected bike only lane, the 2021 AMATS Nonmotorized Plan when through a lot of community review and is the newest plan for facility types in Anchorage. The next steps are to seek funding for capital projects as much of this plan is not in place, but instead is a guide for future projects. Much of this plan is in accordance with the FHWA 2019 Guide for Selection of Bicycle Facilities, which does not prioritize dedicated, protected bicycle lanes in all cases of a BIKE ROUTE. A FHWA chart is excerpted on page 198 of the AMATS NMP and recommends separated paths at higher volumes and speeds as a first choice, not necessarily bike lanes. Older roads lacking improvements are still legal as the first level of bicycling – as shared use, in lane bicycling to the right hand side unless otherwise prohibited. This can also be a BIKE ROUTE. The MUTCD Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, specifies that any legal route can be a BIKE ROUTE, regardless of facility type.

    We don’t maintain a list of the signs. We did a one-time inventory that is now about 7 years out of date. To have another inventory taken would require a funded project. You would need to work with (for instance) your legislator or AMATS to convince them of the purpose and need to propose the project, and they would begin the process of developing the scope, getting it on a project list and finding funding. This can be a several year process.

    I hope this is helpful to you. We encourage anyone wanting to see certain facility types to work with AMATS to fund future projects and update future plans.

    Have a good evening.

    Jill Reese
    Public Information Officer/Special Projects

    Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities
    Central Region Director’s Office
    4111 Aviation Avenue
    PO Box 196900
    Anchorage, AK 99519-6900

    Direct: 907.269.0772

    Our mission is to “Keep Alaska Moving through service and infrastructure.”

    —–Original Message—–
    From: Marc-gmail
    Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2022 10:21 AM
    To: Reese, Jill (DOT)
    Subject: Bike route signage

    CAUTION: This email originated from outside the State of Alaska mail system. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

    Jill,

    After reviewing MUTCD and FHWA design guides it would appear that placement of bike route signs at Brayton and similar locations was not only inappropriate but incredibly dangerous . There can be little doubt that such signs should be removed promptly under current FHWA guidance, but as the signs have apparently been there for some years I would like to review the DSR that initially called, for example, for the placement of the bike route signs indicating that Brayton Dr was a bike route (which one would assume contains data regarding actual vehicular speed and volume) so that I can compare the reasoning contained therein with the FHWA guidance in place at the time.

    Additionally, it would appear that there may be hundreds of signs improperly placed by DoT in the MOA such as these. Has DOT ever done a comprehensive audit of all nonmotorist signs in the MOA? If so, how can I get a copy, and if not, how does one go about requesting such an audit?

    Marc Grober

    • craigmedred – craigmedred.news is committed to Alaska-related news, commentary and entertainment. it is dedicated to the idea that if everyone is thinking alike, someone is not thinking. you can contact the editor directly at craigmedred@gmail.com.
      craigmedred says:

      The sad thing here is that it would be easy to repaint that road to put a nice, wide bike lane on one side, given that there is no need for a two-lane road given the low traffic volume. Hell, DOT could easily move in come concrete barriers to segment off one side of the road and make an actual protected multi-use lane for pedestrians and cyclists as an Anchorage first!

      • This is the whole antic run-around AMATS DoT and MoA play regarding planning vs design, community involvement, and Complete Streets/Vision Zero.

        Almost a million dollars a year spent ducking getting anything accomplished, and as can be demonstrated with the Non-motorized Plan (really, virtually all work AMATS has done) even the ducking is sadly defective or subpar 🤣

        And this is all [not] accomplished with the permission of BPAC and Bicycle Anchorage (the latter just one of the non-member private corporations dictating to the MoA how the MoA is to be run 😪

Leave a Reply to netbuoyCancel reply